From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "John Brothers" <johnbr(at)mindspring(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
Date: | 2000-01-28 04:40:56 |
Message-ID: | 000a01bf6949$dde71020$2801007e@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of John Brothers
>
> I don't think that patch will work - Hiroshi whipped up that
> patch for me a
> week ago for a
> different problem - we have a table with duplicate primary keys, which
> seems to be
> an arithmetic overflow problem because the index key values can be both
> very large positive
> and very large negative numbers.
>
What was the result on your environment after applying my patch ?
My patch workded for your test case at least on my machine.
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-28 04:49:14 | Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
Previous Message | John Brothers | 2000-01-28 03:51:40 | Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-01-28 04:46:35 | Re: [HACKERS] TODO list check |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-28 04:39:59 | Re: [HACKERS] TID clarification |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-28 04:49:14 | Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
Previous Message | John Brothers | 2000-01-28 03:51:40 | Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |