Re: quastions about primary key

From: "jack" <datactrl(at)tpg(dot)com(dot)au>
To: <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: quastions about primary key
Date: 2003-01-26 02:29:12
Message-ID: 000901c2c4e2$b7a1ea50$1400a8c0@jac
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql


I try use uique instead of primary key. And it works, it allows null values.
Is there any other difference between primary key and unique?

Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: "jack" <datactrl(at)tpg(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: [SQL] quastions about primary key

> On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, jack wrote:
>
> > Is that possible to have a two columns primary key on a table with null
> > value on second column?
>
> No, because primary key implies not null on all columns involved
> (technically I think it's that a non-deferrable primary key implies
> not null on all columns involved, but we don't support deferrable ones)
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-01-26 03:51:30 Re: returning setof in plpgsql
Previous Message Evgen Potemkin 2003-01-25 12:06:38 Filter function