Re: Problem with updating system indices.

From: Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problem with updating system indices.
Date: 2000-07-31 04:53:32
Message-ID: 0007311157290I.28220@dyp.perchine.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Relation idescs[Num_pg_index_indices];
> ^^^^^^^^
>
> Dunno whether you have Num_pg_largeobject_indices =
> Num_pg_index_indices, but in any case there's a latent
> stack clobber here.

Ough... That's bad to work too much...

> > CommandCounterIncrement();
>
> Are you sure it's a good idea to be incrementing the CC here?
> This seems like a pretty low-level routine, so there might be
> people further up the stack who do not want this done.

Hmmm... Problem is that if I did not do this I do not see this change
later when I do lo_create/lo_open inside transaction...
What should I use else for this purpose?

--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine

----------------------------------
E-Mail: dyp(at)perchine(dot)com
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
----------------------------------

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-07-31 05:26:01 Re: pre-6.1-to-6.1 conversion procs slated for destruction
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-07-31 03:20:15 Re: pg_dump & performance degradation