Re: Big 7.1 open items

From: Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)webline(dot)dk>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-16 23:02:49
Message-ID: 00061701015105.29410@bering
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> (At least not when we're sitting atop a well-done filesystem,
> which may leave the Linux folk out in the cold ;-).)

Exactly what fs of Linux are you talking about? I believe that for a database
server, ReiserFS would be a natural choice.

--
Kaare Rasmussen --Linux, spil,-- Tlf: 3816 2582
Kaki Data tshirts, merchandize Fax: 3816 2582
Howitzvej 75 ben 14.00-18.00 Email: kar(at)webline(dot)dk
2000 Frederiksberg Lrdag 11.00-17.00 Web: www.suse.dk

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-06-16 23:11:08 RE: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-06-16 22:48:28 Re: planner question re index vs seqscan

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-06-16 23:11:08 RE: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message David Reid 2000-06-16 21:23:20 Re: Re: BeOS and IPC - try 999