From: | Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)webline(dot)dk> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
Date: | 2000-06-16 23:02:49 |
Message-ID: | 00061701015105.29410@bering |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> (At least not when we're sitting atop a well-done filesystem,
> which may leave the Linux folk out in the cold ;-).)
Exactly what fs of Linux are you talking about? I believe that for a database
server, ReiserFS would be a natural choice.
--
Kaare Rasmussen --Linux, spil,-- Tlf: 3816 2582
Kaki Data tshirts, merchandize Fax: 3816 2582
Howitzvej 75 ben 14.00-18.00 Email: kar(at)webline(dot)dk
2000 Frederiksberg Lrdag 11.00-17.00 Web: www.suse.dk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-06-16 23:11:08 | RE: Big 7.1 open items |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-16 22:48:28 | Re: planner question re index vs seqscan |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-06-16 23:11:08 | RE: Big 7.1 open items |
Previous Message | David Reid | 2000-06-16 21:23:20 | Re: Re: BeOS and IPC - try 999 |