Re: Odd release numbers for development versions?

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: "Robert B(dot) Easter" <reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Robert B(dot) Easter" <reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Odd release numbers for development versions?
Date: 2000-06-07 02:11:33
Message-ID: 00060622131802.00745@lorc.wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 06 Jun 2000, Robert B. Easter wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2000, Lamar Owen wrote:

> > "Release Stable; release when necessary" is all that is needed when the
> > developers use CVS properly. You want to be a developer? Grab the CVS
> > tree and start hacking. Patches are readily accepted if they are
> > acceptable.

> Thanks for the invitation. I'd like contributing something back to this
> project someday.

I'm sure that you could find something in our TODO list to meet your fancy...
:-)

My response wasn't intended as a flame; although, in hindsight, I see I was
harsher than I meant to be. Sorry 'bout that.

--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2000-06-07 02:13:31 Re: Odd release numbers for development versions?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-07 01:36:36 Re: [HACKERS] INSTALL/install.sgml file