Re: pg_access

From: "Eric Redmond" <redmonde(at)purdue(dot)edu>
To: "'PostGreSQL Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_access
Date: 2002-07-09 22:14:18
Message-ID: 000601c22795$f7ed4e50$25050a80@ad.cs.purdue.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'm afraid that I don't hold as much faith as you that Linux will become
the "defacto standard" toolset for all website servers. MS, despite its
major shortcomings, is fairly slow and steady when it comes to
improvements to its OS. That said, Access is crap because no one uses it
for what it was built to be used for. And I would imagine that MS would
rather spend their time/money on SQL Server development. I agree with
you that pgsql needs a more powerful, GUI interface. The QBE interface
in Access is nice. However, I don't agree that it is unimportant to have
a Windows version. Point being, that Linux users are used to - and sadly
often expect - poor interfaces with the programs they use. Windows users
are far less forgiving. If, what you are talking about, is truly wide
spread use for PC's and small-time web-servers then a Windows interface
is damn near necessary.

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
Arthur(at)LinkLine(dot)com
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:05 PM
To: PostGreSQL Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_access

I'm pleased to see some renewed interest in pg_access. It seems obvious
to me that MS Access is not currently...and probably never will be able
to handle data in a robust and reliable fashion. MS Access' apparent
success is due to the user interface quality and "ease of use" for
"non-programmers". The "Relationships View" window, for example, is one
of the best and most useful features ever invented for any database
toolset.

In reality PostGreSQL is in a "strong position" to fill the "reliability
void" left by MS Access. However, the general public doesn't know much
about the short comings of Access, due to MS advertising and sales
efforts. It seems clear to me that the best way to "promote" the use of
PostGreSQL is to offer more "ease of use" GUI interfaces for changing
table structures, indexes, relationships, and upgrading older versions
of files. Although it would be nice to have a native Windows version of
PostGreSQL, as well as a Linux version, I expect Linux to replace
Windows on a large number of PCs in the near future. I think that
"having a Windows version" will not be a significant issue at that
point. However, GUI based "ease of use" features WILL be an extremely
important issue and will increase in importance for the rest of the
forseeable future. Using a "browser" to implement the GUI toolset is a
good start, but it probably won't support the same degree of user
friendliness that is seen in the "Relationships View" window of MS
Access, where a relationship can be instantly "drawn" with a mouse, and
fields added to the Table with a simple "right click" on the Table
header.

If we do a good job of providing GUI based tools, similar to MS Access,
as well as conversion tools from Access to PostGreSQL for existing data,
then PostGreSQL and Linux should quickly become the "defacto standard"
toolset for all website servers. It seems to me like PostGreSQL is
already on this pathway, "like it or not", and that focussing on the GUI
toolset is essential to maintaining a good relationship with those who
are new to the Linux world. Whether you realize it or not, there is a
humongous tidal wave of MS Access users currently gathering enough
database theory expertise to "realize" the MS "snow job" they've been
given about its reliability. They will be forced into finding another
solution and chances are VERY good they won't opt for MS SQL Server or
Oracle. If we are ready to give a solution to them...great....sorry MS,
but they seem to "like us better". If we are not ready, then our future
won't have anything to do with MS, only our own lack of vision.

At our current level of GUI tools, we can't expect any positive response
even from fairly talented self taught computer programmers who have been
interested in Linux since 1998 or later. Soon, there will be many
Windows IT Specialists who will be seriously investigating the Linux OS
and the "best database tools" available for it. Add to this list "end
users" who are fed up with daily Windows crashes and are experimenting
with hosting their own DSL based website servers....and well...there's
your tidal wave! Ready or not....the wave is directly behind us....time
to "paddle" for all we're worth!

Sincerely,

Arthur Baldwin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-07-09 22:17:52 Question about syscache
Previous Message Ned Lilly 2002-07-09 21:37:48 Re: [HACKERS] bugzilla.pgaccess.org