From: | "Barnes" <aardvark(at)ibm(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | <kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: [GENERAL] scheduling table design |
Date: | 2000-02-24 15:06:57 |
Message-ID: | 000601bf7ed8$cb9d1b90$0a64a8c0@fries |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Yes, it is a tool for the support staff to handle scheduling. I would be
very reluctant to allow patients to use an appointment scheduling tool for a
doctor. People who aren't trained tend to do unpredictable things, whether
intentionally or accidently, and while I won't rule out the ability to
someday see openings in the schedule and insert an appointment from the
Internet, I think the potential risks are high. Someone with an ill founded
sense of humor might decide to fill in a hundred appointments for Mickey
Mouse, which would be expensive.
What do you think?
David Barnes
aardvark(at)ibm(dot)net
-----Original Message-----
From: kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com [mailto:kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 2:30 PM
To: Ed Loehr
Cc: Barnes; pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] scheduling table design
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Ed Loehr wrote:
> Barnes wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to build what amounts to an appointment book for a doctor's
> > office. ...
> >
so, it is used by office secretary, not patient directly? why not?
I'm curious.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-02-24 16:18:23 | Re: [GENERAL] AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS |
Previous Message | Jose Soares | 2000-02-24 08:50:11 | Re: [GENERAL] AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS |