| From: | "Taral" <taral(at)cyberjunkie(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Aleksey Demakov" <avd(at)gcom(dot)ru>, <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: [INTERFACES] ORB API |
| Date: | 1998-11-16 15:29:46 |
| Message-ID: | 000601be1175$f0ed9360$8a14f7d0@taral.dobiecenter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
> I believe that ORBit is the best candidate, though it's not yet
> complete and its ability to interoperate with other implementations
> is to be proven. But unlike others it doesn't require egcs or
> OS thread support (omniORB). It is intended for real work, not
> for education (mico). It is in active development wich we can
> join to.
But does it fully support the basic CORBA 2.2 API *right now*? The point of
using mico was that we can easily switch ORBs later on since the 2.2 API is
so specific.
Example:
omniORB does not use the 2.2 perform_work()/run() functions, but instead has
an extension to the impl_is_ready() function. Although their implementation
is valid under 2.0, it is *not* valid under 2.2.
Taral
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Robinson | 1998-11-16 15:31:03 | Re: [INTERFACES] Updated IDL with considerations for COSS |
| Previous Message | Byron Nikolaidis | 1998-11-16 14:57:06 | Re: a problem with Byron's latest source release of psqlodbc |