| From: | "Robert B(dot) Easter" <reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) |
| Date: | 2000-05-22 01:03:25 |
| Message-ID: | 00052121095206.14806@comptechnews |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 21 May 2000, Chris Bitmead wrote:
> It is from
> ftp://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/standards/sql
> and dated 1994. Is there something more recent?
I believe so! 1994 is an old draft. From what I understand, SQL3 is an
official ISO standard as of sometime back in 1999. It may be that the
official standard cut out the things you quoted.
Try downloading the stuff at:
ftp://jerry.ece.umassd.edu/isowg3/x3h2/Standards/
>
> > What is the date on the copy of the SQL/Foundation you are reading? My copy is
> > dated September 23, 1999 ISO/IEC 9075-2 SQL3_ISO. I tried searching for the
> > quotes above and could not find them. Do I have the correct version?
--
Robert B. Easter
reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-05-22 01:05:22 | Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-22 00:23:00 | Re: rules on INSERT can't UPDATE new instance? |