Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO)

From: "Robert B(dot) Easter" <reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO)
Date: 2000-05-20 22:25:57
Message-ID: 00052018353302.14806@comptechnews
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 20 May 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> UNDER <supertable>, <supertable>, ...

The standard is very confusing, I am probably wrong, but I didn't see the
syntax for allowing more than one <supertable clause> after the UNDER keyword.

Did Oracle approve ANSI-ISO-9075? I didn't notice them listed anywhere. 9075
is the SQL3 standard right? (or else I'm reading the wrong stuff!!) :)

--
Robert B. Easter
reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris 2000-05-21 00:55:34 Re: OO Patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-20 21:44:45 Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))