Re: FW: Index usage

From: "BBI Edwin Punzalan" <edwin(at)bluebamboo(dot)ph>
To: "'gnari'" <gnari(at)simnet(dot)is>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: Index usage
Date: 2004-11-24 09:43:52
Message-ID: 000501c4d20a$1b842ed0$b400a8c0@bluebamboo.ph
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


Yes, the database is being vacuum-ed and analyzed on a daily basis.

Our version is 7.2.1

-----Original Message-----
From: gnari [mailto:gnari(at)simnet(dot)is]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 4:35 PM
To: BBI Edwin Punzalan; pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] FW: Index usage

From: "BBI Edwin Punzalan" <edwin(at)bluebamboo(dot)ph>

> db=# explain analyze select date from chatlogs where date>='11/23/04'
> and date<'11/25/04';
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
>
> Seq Scan on chatlogs (cost=0.00..24763.19 rows=9200 width=4) (actual
> time=0.45..4268.00 rows=23787 loops=1) Total runtime: 4282.81 msec
> ==============
>
> How come a query on the current date filter uses an index and the
> others does not? This makes indexing to speed up queries quite
> difficult.

have you ANALYZED the table lately ?
what version postgres are you using ?

gnari

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2004-11-24 10:16:53 Re: FW: FW: Index usage
Previous Message songtebo 2004-11-24 09:36:56 Unsubscribe