From: | "Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin(at)ingenico(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Michael Meskes" <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Subject: Re: Additional fixes to ecpg - please apply patch |
Date: | 2002-03-11 22:44:54 |
Message-ID: | 000501c1c94e$5d09f410$660d090a@software.ingenico.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
I can give it a try, but I'm not familiar with lex and yacc so I can't
promise anything.
Nicolas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Meskes" <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin(at)ingenico(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:55 PM
Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Additional fixes to ecpg - please apply patch
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:41:33PM +1100, Nicolas Bazin wrote:
> > It works except that you overwrote a previous patch I submitted that was
already applied (see mail joined).
>
> I'm sorry for that. Since I thought cvs would merge the changes I didn't
> check.
>
> > Sorry for sending you a diff in the wrong order.
>
> No problem.
>
> > Also I though the type definition syntax could be enhanced. Instaead of
defining
> > ...
> > Both syntax can be maintained for compatibility of existing
> > application, but I find the second one easier to maintain because
> > there is no code duplication.Can you do it ? Nicolas
>
> Yes, you are right. The first should be kept for compatibility, but the
> second i seasier to use. I will ad this to my todo list. But I have no
> idea at all, when I will find time to implement it. So, if you can send
> patches, they are more than welcome.
>
> Michael
> --
> Michael Meskes
> Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De
> Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
> Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mars T | 2002-03-12 17:30:02 | INSERTing and UPDATEing records with libpq |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-03-11 17:01:25 | Re: NEWBIE ant build.xml FAILED !! |