| From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | copyObject() ? |
| Date: | 1999-02-23 00:13:05 |
| Message-ID: | 000501be5ec1$490adba0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello all,
AFAIC the relation between objects is not copied correctly
by copyObject() (i.e the same pointers to an object are copied
to different pointers by copyObject()).
I think it makes copyObject() unreliable.
I have some bug-reports due to this cause.(see attached file)
We should patch one by one ?
There is a way to maintain the list of (old,new) pairs during
copyObject() operations.
We could copyObject() correctly with this mechanism,though
there may be the problem of performance.
Comment ?
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| plpgbugs.txt | text/plain | 826 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chuang Fang-sheng | 1999-02-23 00:16:28 | subscribe |
| Previous Message | Ryan Bradetich | 1999-02-22 23:18:48 | discussion on proposed int8_ops patch |