Re: ODBC not reporting RI violations.

From: Tibor Laszlo <ltibor(at)mail(dot)tiszanet(dot)hu>
To: "Gene Sokolov" <hook(at)aktrad(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ODBC not reporting RI violations.
Date: 2000-04-19 18:47:33
Message-ID: 00041920504200.01171@tir
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

> PGSQL 7.0beta5, freebsd 4.0
> MS WinNT ODBC driver 6.50.00.00
>
> Seems like there is a problem in the way RI violations are reported through
> ODBC.
>
> If I execute the following query in psql, I get an error (which is correct):
>
> afmt=# INSERT INTO
> Orders(AccNum,Type,OpenTS,RefPosition,ItemID,IsBuy,Lots,OrdPrice,StpPrice,Lm
> tPrice,Expires)
> VALUES(1,1,'19 Apr 2000 15:17:46',0,4,1,1,104.30,0.,0.,'20 Apr 2000
> 00:00:00');
>
> ERROR: <unnamed> referential integrity violation - key referenced from
> orders not found in positions
>
> But if the same query is executed through ODBC, the error is not reported,
> the query just gets silently ignored. ODBC reports success, when in reality
> the query was aborted.
>
> All other errors are reported properly. This seems to be specific to RI
> violations.
>
> Gene Sokolov.

Yes. We reported the same things some weeks ago. Now there is a patch for
correcting this, I sent to Thomas, maybe found in current CVS in the ODBC
driver subtree. (Thomas is out of town for two weeks.) If urgent, we may send
the patch to the INTERFACES list.

Regards, Zoltan
(Tibor's friend)

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arkin 2000-04-19 20:11:02 Re: Is this usage correct ?
Previous Message John David Garza 2000-04-19 17:59:13 Re: Large strings