Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: lc_time and localized dates

From: "Gevik Babakhani" <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "'Zdenek Kotala'" <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, "'Euler Taveira de Oliveira'" <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Subject: Re: lc_time and localized dates
Date: 2008-02-26 18:53:42
Message-ID: 000401c878a8$ebda99f0$0a01a8c0@gevmus (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
> This is what you get when you copy a proprietary, poorly 
> specified interface.  
> The to_char functions are supposed to be Oracle-compatible, 
> so we need to check what Oracle does.  Whether that is useful 
> in practice is a bit secondary.
> I'm beginning to think, if you want formatting functions that 
> are more sane, stable, and standardized, export sprintf and 
> strftime to PostgreSQL.

Perhaps this is good time to think about (I'm being careful to say redesign)
a review both regarding date/time formatting and locale handling for these
functions in general.


In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-02-26 19:08:03
Subject: Re: Bulk Insert tuning
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-02-26 18:47:16
Subject: Re: lc_time and localized dates

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group