RE: Big 7.1 open items

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
>
> > "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > > Now I like neither relname nor oid because it's not sufficient
> > > for my purpose.
> >
> > We should probably not do much of anything with this issue until
> > we have a clearer understanding of what we want to do about
> > tablespaces and schemas.
>
> Here is an analysis of our options:
>
> Work required Disadvantages
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
>
> Keep current system no work rename/create
> no rollback
>
> relname/oid but less work new pg_class column,
> no rename change filename not
> accurate on
> rename
>
> relname/oid with more work complex code
> rename change during
> vacuum
>
> oid filename less work, but confusing to admins
> need admin tools
>

Please add my opinion for naming rule.

relname/unique_id but need some work new pg_class column,
no relname change. for unique-id generation filename not relname

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp