RE: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage?

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Vadim Mikheev" <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Cyrus Rahman" <cr(at)photox(dot)jcmax(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage?
Date: 1999-09-01 01:36:42
Message-ID: 000401bef41a$71da1fc0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: root(at)sunpine(dot)krs(dot)ru [mailto:root(at)sunpine(dot)krs(dot)ru]On Behalf Of Vadim
> Mikheev
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 1:18 AM
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Cyrus Rahman; Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage?
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Interestingly, this isn't a big problem on platforms where there is
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > a relatively low limit on number of open files per process. A backend
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > will run its open file count up to the limit and then stay there

It's not a small problem on platforms such as cygwin, OS2 where we
couldn't unlink open files. We have to close useless file descriptors
ASAP there.

6.5.2-release should be stable as possible.
So I don't object to the riskless way as Vadim mentioned.

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-09-01 01:51:02 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-08-31 22:57:11 Re: CVS Broken?