Oops in snprintf.c

From: "Taral" <taral(at)mail(dot)utexas(dot)edu>
To: <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Oops in snprintf.c
Date: 1998-10-07 21:19:01
Message-ID: 000401bdf238$1a967400$3b291f0a@taral
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I think I mentioned this before, but no-one fixed it... The variable 'value'
is being assigned a long_long when %ll is being used, but value is only a
'long'... Don'tcha wish there were type-checking for va_arg?

Enjoy.

Taral

*** ./backend/port/snprintf.c.orig Wed Oct 7 17:15:04 1998
--- ./backend/port/snprintf.c Wed Oct 7 17:16:07 1998
***************
*** 130,136 ****
--- 130,140 ----
dopr(char *buffer, const char *format,...)
{
int ch;
+ #ifdef HAVE_LONG_INT_64
+ long_long value;
+ #else
long value;
+ #endif
int longflag = 0;
int longlongflag = 0;
int pointflag = 0;

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-07 21:33:07 Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)
Previous Message David Hartwig 1998-10-07 20:34:15 Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)