RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Vadim Mikheev" <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, "Lincoln Yeoh" <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Developers List" <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions
Date: 1999-11-30 00:34:03
Message-ID: 000201bf3aca$9a3a9ac0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hi all,

I propose here that we stop the release of lock before end of transaction.
I have been suffering from the early release of lock.

Comments ?

If we don't allow DDL command inside transaction block,we won't need
the release before end of transaction.
If we allow DDL command inside transaction block,it may be a problem.
But are there any other principles which could guarantee consistency ?

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-11-30 00:37:27 Re: [GENERAL] memory
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-11-30 00:03:11 Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql's "copy tablefrom STDIN" and DBD-Pg.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-11-30 01:21:22 Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_ctl
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-11-30 00:31:20 Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments