| From: | "Atesz" <atesz(at)ritek(dot)hu> | 
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Own opclass and LIKE problem again! | 
| Date: | 2004-04-26 10:11:50 | 
| Message-ID: | 000101c42b76$e7125490$0b02010a@atesz | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql | 
Hi!
Thank you very much the answers for my previous 'Multi ordered select
and indexing' question! I tried your suggestions, and those are working
well. We found a problem when used '(-col2)' instead of 'col2 DESC'.
This solution working as a functional index and in our experience when
the planner evaluates the cost of using this functional index, it uses
0.5% of the table's size. Usually this estimate is bad, and the query is
slow. Why is it working such? Preferably should I ask this on the
HACKERS or PERFORMANCE list?
But my main question how can I force the LIKE operator for using my own
operator class. I can create own LIKE operator, but it won't use my
reverse order operator class (and its indexes). How can I exchange the
standard LIKE operator with my own, which use my special reverse order
indexes?
For examle: (~~ means LIKE)
  col ~~ 'asd%'   working as  ((col >= 'asd'::text) AND (col <
'ase'::text))
I'd like to see the next:
  col /~~ 'asd%'    working as  ((col />= 'asd'::text) AND (col /<
'ase'::text))
Can somebody help us?
Thanks in advance.
Antal Attila
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dan Field | 2004-04-26 11:08:11 | SQL Query Timeouts | 
| Previous Message | Antal Attila | 2004-04-26 10:07:33 | Own opclass and LIKE problem again! |