From: | "Regina Obe" <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | <strk(at)kbt(dot)io>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'Laurenz Albe'" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | RE: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames |
Date: | 2022-10-31 05:55:05 |
Message-ID: | 000001d8eced$539c5bf0$fad513d0$@pcorp.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Just to reiterate the main impetus for this patch is to save PostGIS from
shipping 100s of duplicate extension files for each release.
> And now with the actual patch attached ... (sorry)
>
> --strk;
>
Sandro, can you submit an updated version of this patch.
I was testing it out and looked good first time.
But I retried just now testing against master, and it fails with
commands/extension.o: In function `file_exists':
postgresql-git\src\backend\commands/extension.c:3430: undefined reference to
`AssertArg'
It seems 2 days ago AssertArg and AssertState were removed.
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=b1099eca8f38f
f5cfaf0901bb91cb6a22f909bc6
So your use of AssertArg needs to be replaced with Assert I guess.
I did that and was able to test again with a sample extension I made
Called:
wildtest
1) The wildcard patch in its current state only does anything if
wildcard_upgrades = true
is in the control file. If it's false or missing, then the behavior of
extension upgrades doesn't change.
2) It only understands % as a complete wildcard for a version number
So this is legal
wildtest--%--2.0.sql
This does nothing
wildtest--2%--2.0.sql
3) I confirmed that if you have a path such as
wildtest--2.0--2.2.sql
wildtest--%--2.2.sql
then the exact match trumps the wildcard. In the above case if I am on 2.0
and going to 2.2, the wildtest--2.0--2.2.sql script is used instead of the
wildtest--% one.
4) It is not possible to downgrade with the wildcard. For example I had
paths
wildtest--%--2.1.sql
and I was unable to go from a version 2.2 down to a version 2.1. I didn't
check why that was so, but probably a good thing.
If everyone is okay with this patch, we'll go ahead and add tests and
documentation to go with it.
Thanks,
Regina
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-10-31 06:05:44 | Re: Adding doubly linked list type which stores the number of items in the list |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-10-31 05:46:53 | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |