Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function

From: "Tony Marston" <tony(at)marston-home(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Jim C(dot) Nasby'" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
Date: 2005-10-09 10:05:41
Message-ID: 000001c5ccb9$06c33680$c800a8c0@ajmnotebook
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 08 October 2005 22:30
> To: Jim C. Nasby
> Cc: Tony Marston; pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT()
> function
>
>
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> > And you might want to make it a project at http://pgfoundry.org so
> > others can make use of it. You might also want to define it as
> > accepting an array; I think that would allow you to accept
> any number
> > of parameters.
>
> I think Tony is trying to avoid putting in any actual work
> ;-). To me, the sanest change would be to modify his app to
> use the SQL-standard syntax. Which surely is supported by
> those other databases too, no? And if not, why are *we* the
> ones getting the bug report?
>
> regards, tom lane

You are getting this as a bug report for the simple reason that your website
does not seem to have a method of accepting enhancement requests. That is
why I specifically put ENHANCEMENT REQUEST in the description.

Tony Marston

http://www.tonymarston.net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Marston 2005-10-09 10:05:42 Re: BUG #1937: Parts of information_schema only accessible to owner
Previous Message Maher Abdel Karim 2005-10-09 08:15:48 BUG #1949: Inserting Unicode hindi numbers