RE: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5?

From: "Stupor Genius" <stuporg(at)erols(dot)com>
To: "Pgsql-Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5?
Date: 1999-06-19 00:27:16
Message-ID: 000001beb9ea$7bc5d0c0$7f98accf@darren
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)remapcorp(dot)com> writes:
> > has something changed with r-tree indexes in 6.5?
> > ERROR: Operator 500 must have a restriction selectivity estimator to be
> > used in a btree index
>
> ...
>
> The right fix would be to put in an appropriate selectivity estimator,
> but we can't do that as a 6.5.* patch because changing pg_operator
> requires an initdb. It will have to wait for 6.6.

Would it possible to write an sql script to put in the changes?

Seems it should be possible to do this for any non-code changes
that affect the system tables.

Darren

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-06-19 01:04:16 Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-06-19 00:16:15 Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5?