| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: recovery_connections cannot start |
| Date: | 2010-04-27 14:52:46 |
| Message-ID: | -4422948886614158345@unknownmsgid |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 15:10 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Treating the string "true" as a special case seems like a kludge to
>>> me. Maybe a robust set of internal commands wouldn't be a kludge,
>>> but
>>> that's not what's being proposed here. I guess it's just a matter
>>> of
>>> opinion.
>>
>> I don't see how to have internal commands without having special
>> cases
>> for the setting, and I did propose "pg_archive_bypass" as the name. I
>> guess the implementation would be what Simon was talking about,
>> though.
>>
>> I don't see "true" as meaningful in the context of an
>> archive_command…
>
> Saying "its a kludge" doesn't really address the issue and goes
> nowhere
> towards fixing it. If we don't like the proposal, fine, then what is
> the
> alternative solution?
I proposed one upthread.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-04-27 15:04:43 | Re: Wierd quirk of HS/SR, probably not fixable |
| Previous Message | Michael Tharp | 2010-04-27 14:32:50 | Re: Differential backup |