Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #2487: Immutable functions results

From: "Eresmas" <multiacademia(at)eresmas(dot)com>
To: <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #2487: Immutable functions results
Date: 2006-06-22 19:50:26
Message-ID: !~! (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Dear Tom:

Sorry, but I think you can see the problem without the definition of the
function. If after this message you continue thinking you need the source of
the function I will send it to the list. I don't want to extend so much the

There is a master table (tablea) and a detail table (childtablea). With
"otherfunction" I want to retrieve in a string all the values related with a
row in the master table, separated by a "-". 

select otherfunction('childtablea', 'fielda', fielda) from tablea;

So, otherfunction takes three parameters, the first is the name of a detail
table (childtablea), the second is the name of a foreign key in that table
(fielda) which references a primary key (also called fielda) in a master
table (tablea), and the third is the value of the foreign key I'm looking

"immutablefunction_a" and "immutablefunction_b" are both wrappers functions
for "otherfunction", because I can't create a functional index over a
function with static arguments.... (This is true, isn't it?????)

So, the definition of immutablefunction_a is:

create function immutablefunction_a(int) returns text as '
	return otherfunction('childtablea','fielda', $1);
end;' language plpgsql immutable;

create function immutablefunction_b(int) returns text as '
	return otherfunction('childtableb','fieldb', $1);
end;' language plpgsql immutable;

So, the "bug" is that the when the result for immutablefunction_a(10) is,
for example, "10-20-30" and the result for immutablefunction_b(30) is
"10-20-30", and if this is used in the join clause, records are not

I hope you can understand me, I know is a little complicated schema....

Thank you very much.

P.D.: Tom, is the first time I speak to you, and I want to express my
congratulations for the work you and your folks are making. I'm very pleased
with the product.

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us] 
Enviado el: jueves, 22 de junio de 2006 16:55
Para: Pedro J. Romero
CC: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Asunto: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2487: Immutable functions results 

"Pedro J. Romero" <multiacademia(at)eresmas(dot)com> writes:
> Sorry if this not a bug, but I think so:

This report is useless, since you have not shown us either function.

			regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-06-23 00:23:46
Subject: Re: BUG #2486: PANIC when CTRL-C on vacuum full analyze
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-06-22 18:46:56
Subject: Re: BUG #2488: backup history file is archived doubly

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group