Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Date: 2010-04-17 15:25:46
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> AFAICS the example you give isn't correct.
>> We would lay out the values like this
>> W-3 W-2 W-1 W 3 4 5
>> where W is the wrap value
> Stop right there, you're already failing to think clearly.  There is no
> unique "wrap value", all values act the same in circular XID space.

Or to put it a different way, what happens when the "wrap value"
changes?  An array that was in order under one wrap value can cease to
be in order under another.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-04-17 16:04:52
Subject: Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-04-17 15:13:46
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group