Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: master in standby mode croaks

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: master in standby mode croaks
Date: 2010-04-14 11:07:34
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 09:02 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> So this can fail in either of two ways
> If I understand this correctly, it is unconvincing as a failure mode
> since it doesn't follow any of the documented procedures for creating a
> standby. There are many ways to screw up that ignore the manual, which
> is why the manual exists.
> If you can show a full test case, with failure, then I'll follow it
> through.

Huh?  If I had done everything correctly, of course I wouldn't have
gotten an error message at all.  Surely the point is that if I do
something wrong, I should get an error message that describes what I
actually did wrong rather than an error message telling me that I did
something wrong which I clearly did not do.

The recent patch to allow starting from a shutdown checkpoint means
that a standby can be created by shutting down the master and taking a
filesystem-level snapshot of the cluster directly, creating
recovery.conf, and firing it up again.  Anyone who does that with the
default postgresql.conf, though, is going to get a message telling
them that they need to change a setting which is already set


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-04-14 11:10:02
Subject: Re: BUG #5412: test case produced, possible race condition.
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-04-14 10:29:27
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Startup at shutdown checkpoint

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group