Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Timestamp operator error

From: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Timestamp operator error
Date: 2002-02-26 06:13:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-sql

> Pretty trivial when it's only the commutation of an existing
>  operator...

Which then makes me think of a proposal for Postgres 7.3 or 7.4:

If you enabled delaration of operators as "commutative", you could cut
 the required number of operator definitions by a third.

Just a thought.


______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
                                       Josh Berkus
  Complete information technology      josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
   and data management solutions       (415) 565-7293
  for law firms, small businesses        fax 621-2533
    and non-profit organizations.      San Francisco

In response to

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Kancha .Date: 2002-02-26 06:35:14
Subject: transaction abortion
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2002-02-26 05:42:04
Subject: Re: Timestamp operator error

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group