Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date: 2025-06-30 23:42:51
Message-ID: puvsqytcz6hud4s4jd7cw3y6ty6yeaop6i7jubxxzlbs2glenq@larnstyl6nrs
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2025-07-01 00:52:49 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 30 Jun 2025, at 20:33, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 10:02 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> >>> On 30 Jun 2025, at 18:58, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> >>> Probably just needs to be added to the installed_targets list.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the report, I'll take a look today to get it fixed.
> >
> > Thanks both!
> >
> > Looking at the installed_targets stuff, though... why do we use `meson
> > install --no-rebuild` in combination with `depends:
> > installed_targets`? Can't we just use Meson's dependency tracking
> > during installation, and avoid this hazard?

I don't think that's really possible - the dependency tracking is useful to
generate granular *rebuild* information, but doesn't help with the first
build.

If we had dependency generation for the install target it could be helpful to
discover missing dependencies though.

> I suspect it is because without --no-rebuild the quiet target isn't entirely
> quiet.

No - the issue is that you're not allowed to run ninja while ninja is running,
as that would corrupt it's tracking (and build things multiple times). meson
install --no-rebuild would run ninja to build things...

> Still, I was unable to make something that work in all build combinations
> while keeping --no-rebuild (which isn't indicative of it being possible to
> do).

Hm, what problem did you encounter? I don't think there should be any
difficulty?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-07-01 00:14:32 Re: On disable_cost
Previous Message Christophe Pettus 2025-06-30 23:00:22 Exposing some hidden serializable transaction costs