Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Trigger on Postgres for tables syncronization

From: Harald Fuchs <hf0722x(at)protecting(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Trigger on Postgres for tables syncronization
Date: 2004-07-27 14:22:00
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
In article <20040727133537(dot)34475(dot)qmail(at)web41807(dot)mail(dot)yahoo(dot)com>,
Prabu Subroto <prabu_subroto(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:

> But I think, the modification of records to the table
> "appointment0" dan "appointment1" must be done
> automatically if my program modifies the
> "appointment".

That's exactly what VIEWs are made for.

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Mike NolanDate: 2004-07-27 14:31:40
Subject: Before/After trigger sequencing question
Previous:From: Pierre-Frédéric CaillaudDate: 2004-07-27 14:18:38
Subject: Re: Sequences & rules

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group