| From: | Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: memcached and PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2004-11-17 07:48:33 |
| Message-ID: | pan.2004.11.17.07.48.31.163515@arvin.dk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:47:54 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> So memcached becomes a very good place to stick data that's read often but not
> updated often, or alternately data that changes often but is disposable. An
> example of the former is a user+ACL list; and example of the latter is web
> session information ... or simple materialized views.
Has anyone tried at least two of
1. memcached
2. Tugela Cache (pretty much the same as memcached, I think)
3. Sharedance
In that case: Do you have any comparative remarks?
Links:
1: http://www.danga.com/memcached/
2: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tugela_Cache
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wikipedia/tugelacache/
3: http://sharedance.pureftpd.org/
--
Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2004-11-17 08:08:20 | Re: memcached and PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-11-17 06:40:07 | Re: query plan question |