Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Standalone backends run StartupXLOG in an incorrect environment

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Standalone backends run StartupXLOG in an incorrect environment
Date: 2010-04-19 15:00:18
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> >> [This is an open item for 9.0, hence the response to an apparently old
>> >> hackers thread]
>> > Thanks for the reply;  9.0 open item removed.
>> I think you misread his reply.  Please put that back.
> OK,  I re-read it and still don't understand, but I don't have to.

I re-read it too and I don't understand either.  This is LISTED as an
open item for 9.0, but it is apparently not a new regression, so I
think we should move it to the Todo list instead.  This problem was
discovered six months ago, is not a new regression, and there is
apparently no movement toward a fix, so it doesn't make sense to me
that we should hold up either 9.0 beta or 9.0 final on account of it.
Or am I confused?


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-04-19 15:02:10
Subject: perltidy
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-04-19 14:55:32
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Tune GetSnapshotData() during Hot Standby by avoiding loop

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group