On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I rebased the patch to HEAD. Is the patch still required for 9.0?
>>> If not, I'd remove the open item of the smart shutdown during
>> I am by no means an expert on this area of the code, but in the
>> interest of moving things along I reviewed this patch tonight.
> Thanks a lot!
>> 1. I wonder if there is a problem if we receive SIGINT while in the
>> PM_WAIT_READONLY state? Seems to me that might need to be added to
>> the if statement beginning at line 2212, in pmdie().
>> 2. It appears to me that HandleChildCrash() needs to switch to
>> PM_WAIT_BACKENDS state if it's in PM_WAIT_READONLY when the child
>> crash occurs - i.e. the if statement beginning at line 2772 needs
> Oh, those are my oversights. You are right!
> I modified the patch as you pointed out.
Cool. This looks good to me now and I also tested it. I will commit
it unless (a) someone objects or (b) someone else does it first.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-03-31 03:21:42|
|Subject: Re: Parameter name standby_mode|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-03-31 03:06:16|
|Subject: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders|