Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Need help with SGML again

From: "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Need help with SGML again
Date: 2003-10-15 22:56:19
Message-ID: p05210614bbb3809f2ee4@[] (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
At 9:46 AM -0700 10/15/03, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>  You should consider the documentation like a book.  That has two
>>  consequences:
>>  1. Linking to anything that is not a formal object (having a title and a
>>  number) does not render well in print.  ("for more information, see
>>  paragraph 3 on page 15"?)
>I see what you mean.   Given that I do 95% of my doc browsing in HTML, this
>seems very redundant to me, though; I think it would be interesting to see
>how many users refer to a paper version of the docs.  We may find it's a tiny

Well, just as a data point I DL/print the docs when I upgrade 
Postgres and keep the book on my shelf for reference.  I may be a bit 
of a curmudgeon, but there isn't a computer display around that's as 
high-quality and portable as a piece of paper.
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry(dot)B(dot)Hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov, or hbhotz(at)oxy(dot)edu

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-10-16 17:37:45
Subject: Missing documention on SIGHUP
Previous:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2003-10-15 18:24:39
Subject: Re: Need help with SGML again

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group