Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views

From: "Marko Tiikkaja" <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>
To: "Jeevan Chalke" <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views
Date: 2013-01-29 20:37:12
Message-ID: op.wrowwa0nye4vw9@blue.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:18:51 +0100, Jeevan Chalke
<jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> That's fine. I am not at all pointing that to you. Have a look at this:

Here's the third version of this patch, hopefully this time without any
problems. I looked through the patch and it looked OK, but I did that
last time too so I wouldn't trust myself on that one.

Marko Tiikkaja

Attachment Content-Type Size
prettyprint_v3.patch application/octet-stream 391.8 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-01-29 21:34:50 Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-01-29 19:30:16 Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema