Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Updates not atomic with respect to indexes

From: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
To: Ben Young <ben(at)transversal(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Updates not atomic with respect to indexes
Date: 2004-04-28 09:34:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:33:34 +0100, Ben Young <ben(at)transversal(dot)com>
>UPDATE temp SET num = num+1;
>ERROR:  duplicate key violates unique constraint "temp_num_key"

>Is this [...] a known problem in Posgresql,


> or bug which will be fixed sometime.

Don't know.

If you need a workaround for now, do it in two steps:

	UPDATE temp SET num = -num;
	UPDATE temp SET num = -num+1;

This assumes you have a range of numbers that is normally not used.


In response to


pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Ian RibasDate: 2004-04-28 12:11:36
Subject: Optimizer choosing smaller index instead of right one
Previous:From: Bogdan VatkovDate: 2004-04-28 09:33:15
Subject: BUG ? or SQL miss understanding ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group