Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: AIX FAQ addition

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AIX FAQ addition
Date: 2005-11-04 23:56:03
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
> Chris Browne wrote:
>> We haven't seen any agreement emerge as to what is causing AIX 5.3 ML3
>> to fail to successfully build the release candidates.
>> However, a patch has emerged (thanks, Seneca!) that does allow it to
>> work, and which I'd expect to be portable (better still!).
>> We are still actively pursuing why it breaks, but supposing that still
>> remains outstanding, at least the following would allow AIX users to
>> better survive a build...
> I can confirm that with that patch applied 8.1RC1 builds and passes a
> complete run of the buildfarm-script(including plpython and with a
> simple makefile-fix plperl) compiled with gcc 4.0.2 and xlc.
> So I think we should definitly add this to the FAQ at least.

Actually, there is a reason NOT to apply the patch in general on all
platforms; it introduces logic (an if {} else {} statement) in a place
where there wasn't previously one, which *presumably* slows things
down somewhat.  I don't know if the memcpy() calls are invoked so
often as to make this material; it's hard to tell.
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.liamg" "@" "enworbbc"))
"Whenever you  find that you  are on the  side of the majority,  it is
time to reform." -- Mark Twain

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Gregory MaxwellDate: 2005-11-05 00:15:22
Subject: Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data
Previous:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2005-11-04 23:40:33
Subject: Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group