Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: recovery.conf location

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: recovery.conf location
Date: 2010-09-29 19:09:05
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think keeping the status information in a transient text file may
>> still be a good design choice.  If you push it into pg_control it will
>> be impossible to modify by hand.
> It could be done with a trivial tool, though.

pg_ctl standby … ?


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marko TiikkajaDate: 2010-09-29 19:14:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] top-level DML under CTEs
Previous:From: James RobinsonDate: 2010-09-29 18:45:20
Subject: Postgres vs. intel ccNUMA on Linux

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group