Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think keeping the status information in a transient text file may
>> still be a good design choice. If you push it into pg_control it will
>> be impossible to modify by hand.
> It could be done with a trivial tool, though.
pg_ctl standby … ?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Marko Tiikkaja||Date: 2010-09-29 19:14:07|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] top-level DML under CTEs|
|Previous:||From: James Robinson||Date: 2010-09-29 18:45:20|
|Subject: Postgres vs. intel ccNUMA on Linux|