Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm wondering if there are any technical/standards constraints that
> are behind the fencing behavior. If there aren't any, maybe an opt-in
The fencing is per standard, and very useful when used in wCTEs.
> keyword might do the trick -- WITH UNBOXED foo AS (..)?
I would paint your proposal WITH VIEW foo AS (), which would make the
behaviour obvious I think.
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Misa Simic||Date: 2012-10-01 13:52:21|
|Subject: Re: is JSON really "a type" (Re: data to json enhancements)|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2012-10-01 13:19:35|
|Subject: Re: embedded list v3|