Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules

From: Taral <taralx(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules
Date: 2006-04-27 17:10:31
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 4/27/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> > There are other ways of achieving the same thing. Structs containing a union
> > for the subclass fields for example.
> Doesn't achieve the same thing, unless you mandate that every part of
> the system use the identical massively-overloaded union struct to refer
> to every node.

If we do subclassing like this:

struct Node { ... };
struct Value { struct Node; ... };

do we still run into the alias problem?

Taral <taralx(at)gmail(dot)com>
"You can't prove anything."
    -- Gödel's Incompetence Theorem

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2006-04-27 17:10:35
Subject: Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3.
Previous:From: TaralDate: 2006-04-27 17:04:45
Subject: Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group