Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: "Jochem van Dieten" <jochemd(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Date: 2006-12-29 08:59:41
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 12/29/06, Stephen Frost wrote:
> So, Debian is distributing an application (exim4 w/ libpq & libssl)
> which includes GPL code (exim4) combined with code under another license
> (BSD w/ advertising clause) which *adds additional restrictions* (the
> advertising clause) over those in the GPL, which is against the terms of
> the GPL.  It's *Debian's* problem, but *PostgreSQL* can solve it by
> providing the option to link against GNUTLS instead.

> In the case above, exim4 *can* provide an exception because it's the
> *GPL* of *exim4* which is being violated by the advertising clause in
> the *OpenSSL* license.  Which exim4 upstream has *done*, and which can
> be seen in their license (linked to previously in this thread).

Considering that the problem is caused by the choice for a license so
restrictive it prohibits linking to OpenSSL, I think a license
exception in said restrictive license is exactly the right way for
Debian to solve their problem.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hubert FONGARNANDDate: 2006-12-29 09:06:31
Subject: Re: WITH support
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-12-29 08:10:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group