Re: Strange behavior with polygon and NaN

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Strange behavior with polygon and NaN
Date: 2021-03-15 12:34:00
Message-ID: f872bb25-66a4-5c54-f14f-ae0a958e6f39@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/21/20 3:30 AM, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:03:42 -0500, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote in
>> I think it should be "needs review" now.
>
> Conflicted with some commit(s) uncertain to me. Rebased.

Tom, Georgios, thoughts on the new patch?

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ajin Cherian 2021-03-15 12:44:01 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2021-03-15 12:29:40 subscriptionCheck failures