| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: sequences and pg_upgrade |
| Date: | 2016-11-14 02:51:34 |
| Message-ID: | f6d8acf4-448b-6c0c-8b2a-ad7180adb2b6@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/2/16 2:34 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I had a look at those fresh patches, and 0001 looks like a good thing.
> This makes the separation between sequences and table data dump
> cleaner. I ran some tests with pg_upgrade and 0002, and things are
> clear. And +1 for the way done in the patch, aka no options of pg_dump
> exposed to user, still keep the option tracking as a separate value.
Committed, thanks.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-11-14 03:49:29 | Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress |
| Previous Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2016-11-14 02:02:07 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |