| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure |
| Date: | 2022-10-31 09:02:35 |
| Message-ID: | f64365b1-d5f9-ef83-41fe-404810f10e5a@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 31.10.22 01:04, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 09:36:23AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Would there be a use for that? It's currently only used in the atomics
>> code.
>
> Yep, but they would not trigger when using atomics in the frontend
> code. We don't have any use for that in core on HEAD, still that
> could be useful for some external frontend code? Please see the
> attached.
I don't think we need separate definitions for frontend and backend,
since the contained Assert() will take care of the difference. So the
attached would be simpler.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Make-AssertPointerAlignment-available-to-frontend-co.patch | text/plain | 1.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2022-10-31 09:27:53 | Error for row-level triggers with transition tables on partitioned tables |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2022-10-31 08:50:02 | Re: Fast COPY FROM based on batch insert |