| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: automating RangeTblEntry node support |
| Date: | 2024-03-22 06:49:51 |
| Message-ID: | f61c3e3f-2b04-4eb1-b343-9f71a7a233b0@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21.03.24 10:51, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> At this point, I'm not too stressed about pressing forward with these
> last two patches. We can look at them again perhaps if we make
> progress
> on a more compact node output format. When I started this thread, I
> had
> a lot of questions about various details about the RangeTblEntry
> struct,
> and we have achieved many answers during the discussions, so I'm happy
> with the progress. So for PG17, I'd like to just do patches 0001..0005.
>
> Patches 1 thru 5 look good to me
Thanks for checking. I have committed these (1 through 5) and will
close the commit fest entry.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey M. Borodin | 2024-03-22 06:53:51 | Re: UUID v7 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-03-22 06:15:27 | Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded |