Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_autovacuum entries

From: Anj Adu <fotographs(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Igor Polishchuk <ipolishchuk(at)hi5(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum entries
Date: 2009-11-04 20:05:28
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-admin
Thanks..i will stick to vacuumdb in 8.1 (which works fine..just takes
a couple of days to finish)

Migration is an option..but our databases are enormous..(> 800G) and
we have several of them

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Anj Adu escribió:
>> If I were to use autovacuum on 8.1 , and If I specify the "ignore'
>> tables in pg_autovacuum,
>> 1. will the XID wraparound counter be reset after autovacuum finishes
> No.
> I think you really need to get off 8.1.
> --
> Alvaro Herrera                      
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2009-11-05 04:19:11
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby doesnt't work
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-11-04 20:00:00
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum entries

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group