Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Date: 2019-03-10 06:42:08
Message-ID: f2db15b4-b76c-d58b-9dc5-9d551557e2ef@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Pail,

On 3/10/19 2:41 AM, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:35 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>> I have marked this patch as targeting PG13 since it is clearly not
>> material for PG12. I also added you as the patch author.
>
> Thanks David! Targeting PG13 was my intention, so sorry if I messed up
> the commitfest entry.

No worries, that's what I'm here for!

> Here is a new patch rebased on top of master. My questions are inline
> as TODO comments for whoever does the review. I'm pretty far along
> with an add-on patch to create temporal *foreign* keys too, which I
> think should be part of this same bundle of work. If anyone happens to
> review the PK patch soon, it might help me avoid the same mistakes in
> the FK work, but if not that's fine too. :-)

Don't worry if you don't attract review in this CF since most people are
focused on PG12 items. Even so, getting your patch in early helps
because it will have history by the time the final CFs for PG13 come around.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2019-03-10 06:55:08 Re: Feature: temporary materialized views
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-03-10 04:54:07 Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take