Re: This is a limit-offset bug?

From: "Emanuel Calvo Franco" <postgres(dot)arg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Emanuel Calvo Franco" <postgres(dot)arg(at)gmail(dot)com>, "General PostgreSQL List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: This is a limit-offset bug?
Date: 2008-12-26 17:17:41
Message-ID: f205bb120812260917w71cb98dbn30a313d102c38068@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2008/12/26 Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 09:52:59AM -0200, Emanuel Calvo Franco wrote:
>> Hi people,
>>
>> Yesterday when i was making some commands on 8.3.5
>> (on Centos)
>> i found a rare behavior of limit offset.
>>
>> Try in psql:
>>
>> select * from foo limit 3; <- shows ok
>> select * from foo limit3; <- shows all rows
>> select * from foo offset1223raf3w4t4tgga; <- shows all rows
>> select * from foo limitsdfsdfaerfgsafqaweawe; <- shows all rows
>> select * from foo limit; <- this shows error ok
>> select * from foo limitt; ....
>
> At a wild gues, if the string after the table name is a single token it
> gets interpreted as an alias for the table. Remember that AS is
> optional.
>

Yes, you're right.
i look at:

create table foo (i serial); (...inserts by default)
select limit111.i from foo limit111; <- this returns all rows on i

Is not a limit question, is about table alias. D'oh!

Sorry...
> Have a nice day,
> --
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
>> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
>> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFJVQpyIB7bNG8LQkwRAs9yAJ9Q03c2M9tXKzmaQpCtxBH3f9aquACgj7sr
> HJuIKqz1NLp8B8EqlOZkym8=
> =Qox3
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

--
Emanuel Calvo Franco
Syscope Postgresql Consultant
ArPUG / AOSUG Member

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivan Sergio Borgonovo 2008-12-26 18:14:00 Re: count (DISTINCT expression [ , ... ] ) and documentation
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2008-12-26 16:46:42 Re: This is a limit-offset bug?