On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> wrote:
> At the cost of one bit of storage, you have compatible types using
Thanks for your review and feedback! Unfortunately, I do need the full range
of the unsigned types for the project I am looking at. The reason I started
working on these types is because it seemed wasteful to use the next size
larger signed integer for the storage type of the unsigned integer.
Thanks for the suggestion!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-07-26 04:03:28|
|Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. |
|Previous:||From: Ryan Bradetich||Date: 2008-07-26 03:41:57|
|Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.|