Re: improve type conversion of SPI_processed in Python

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: improve type conversion of SPI_processed in Python
Date: 2018-01-20 13:21:19
Message-ID: e580151b-6bee-b2c3-bf73-a28beb00024b@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/12/18 11:06, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Would that even be necessary? Why not use the LongLong variant all the
>> time then?
>
> I've not looked at the Python internals to see if one is noticeably faster
> than the other, but if it isn't, yeah we could simplify that. In any case
> my main point is let's keep these two functions using similar approaches.

I ran extensive tests on this and went ahead with the simplified versions.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2018-01-20 13:24:45 Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 4) and patch for hash index
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2018-01-20 12:51:12 Re: [HACKERS] log_destination=file